Method and system for review verification and credibility scoring using blockchain
Test study guide
Quiz
What role does blockchain play in the review verification system?
What do the reviewer identifier and entity identifier represent respectively?
What is the review identifier and what role does it play?
What key information does the verification submission contain?
What is the difference between the verification block and the review block?
How is the credibility of the review determined?
What key information is contained in the credibility block?
How is the credibility of the reviewer determined?
How does the system check the rating of the service entity using the system?
What are the advantages of this system over the traditional review system?
Answer
As a distributed database for storing reviews, verification information and credibility scores, the blockchain is tamper-proof and ensures the authenticity and reliability of the information.
The reviewer identifier represents the unique identifier of the user who submitted the review, and the entity identifier represents the unique identifier of the service entity or product being reviewed.
The review identifier is a unique identifier assigned to each review, which is used to associate the review with the corresponding verification information.
The verification submission contains the reviewer identifier of the verifier, the review identifier of the verified review, and the verifier's affirmative or negative judgment on the review.
The review block stores the reviews submitted by the user, and the verification block stores the verification information of the verifier on the review.
By counting the number of positive and negative verifications for a review, when the number of positive verifications reaches a preset threshold, the review is considered credible.
The credibility block contains the review identifier of the verified review and the credibility status of the review (credible or uncredible).
When the number of credible reviews submitted by a reviewer reaches a preset threshold, the reviewer is considered a credible reviewer.
Consumers can view all reviews and verification information of the service entity by accessing the blockchain, or view the score calculated by the system based on the credibility.
The system uses the immutability of the blockchain to ensure the authenticity and reliability of the reviews and verification information, solves the problem that information in traditional review systems is easily tampered with and deleted, and improves consumers' trust in reviews.
Paper Title
Detailed description of how the system uses blockchain technology to ensure the immutability of reviews and verification information.
Discuss how the system resists the impact of grassroots marketing and other malicious behaviors on reviews.
Analyze the challenges that the system may encounter in practical applications, such as scalability and privacy issues.
Compare the system with traditional review aggregation platforms, such as Yelp or TripAdvisor, and discuss their advantages and disadvantages.
Envision possible future improvements to the system, such as introducing a more complex scoring mechanism or integrating artificial intelligence technology.
Key Terms
Blockchain: A decentralized, distributed database that uses cryptography to ensure data security and immutability.
Block: The basic unit of a blockchain, containing a set of transaction information and other metadata.
Reviewer Identifier: An identifier used to uniquely identify a reviewer.
Entity Identifier: An identifier used to uniquely identify the entity being reviewed.
Review Identifier: An identifier used to uniquely identify a review.
Verification Submission: An operation in which a verifier confirms or refutes a review.
Positive Verification: An operation in which a verifier confirms the authenticity of a review.
Negative Verification: An operation in which a verifier refutes the authenticity of a review.
Credibility: The degree to which a review or reviewer is considered authentic and reliable.
Threshold: A preset quantitative limit used to determine whether a review or reviewer is credible.